A Tale of Two Commissions: Net Neutrality and Regulatory Analysis

نویسندگان

  • Jerry Brito
  • Jerry Ellig
چکیده

Two independent federal regulatory agencies, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), both claim regulatory authority over broadband Internet access. Both have actively explored the costs and benefits of “net neutrality” regulation since 2005, when a series of FCC decisions declared that broadband is an information service rather than a telecommunications service. Since then, the FTC has held a public workshop and issued a 165-page Staff Report. The FCC has issued a Policy Statement, a Notice of Inquiry, and multiple regulations imposing net neutrality rules on 22 MHz of radio spectrum to be auctioned for commercial wireless services. In general, “net neutrality” means that Internet service providers should treat all data packets identically. Traditionally, Internet service providers transported data packets on a “best efforts” basis, with no particular packet receiving priority treatment. Today, Internet service providers can block, slow, or charge unequally for different content if they treat different packets differently. Such discrimination can help or harm consumers, depending on the circum-

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Economics of net neutrality: A review

Network neutrality has been at the center of US telecommunications policy for several years, culminating in a recent FCC order imposing a limited form of net neutrality on US broadband Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The regulatory imposition of nondiscrimination and price regulation (the core of net neutrality) on ISPs has been hotly debated. In this paper, I review the recent economics lit...

متن کامل

Antitrust Oversight of an Antitrust Dispute: An Institutional Perspective on the Net Neutrality Debate

INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 20 I. WHAT PEOPLE ARE ARGUING ABOUT WHEN THEY ARGUE ABOUT NET NEUTRALITY............................................ 22 A. A Taxonomy of IP Networks ................................................... 22 B. A Taxonomy of Net Neutrality Proposals ................................. 24 1. The Anti-Bloc...

متن کامل

Net neutrality and the value chain for video

Net neutrality has, for a number of years, been a topic of often heated discussion in the Internet and telecom community. The issue was put firmly on the agenda by Tim Wu in his famous paper (Wu, 2003) following the discussion on a number of net-neutrality related issues by other authors (e.g. Lemley and Lessig, 2001). Since then, net neutrality has been analyzed extensively in academia and in ...

متن کامل

Network Neutrality Regulation Across South Asia: A Policy Brief Towards an Evidence Based Research Agenda

This policy brief examines key themes highlighted during a series of roundtable discussions exploring South Asian Perspectives on Net Neutrality, hosted by the Centre for Internet and Society in association with the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Observer Research Foundation and IT for Change and provides recommendations for future research agendas on net neutra...

متن کامل

Net Neutrality, Reclassification and Investment: A Further Analysis

In a recent paper, Net Neutrality, Reclassification and Investment: A Counterfactual Analysis1, I used the difference-in-differences methodology to estimate the effect on telecommunications investment of the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) Net Neutrality policies, including especially the Agency’s decision to reclassify broadband as a Title II common carrier telecommunications servi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007